Sustainability

Eco hype or eco reality?

by FESPA | 17/03/2020
Eco hype or eco reality?

The industry has been blessed with two life threatening events: digital technology gave us electronic prepress and typesetting; the internet wiped out whole sectors of publishing and production.

Nailing down what makes a system sustainable or not exercises some of the best brains on the planet. Mostly this is in response to the threats of climate change, but the graphics industry’s sustainability credentials are mostly based on responses to existential threats. The industry has been blessed with two life threatening events: digital technology gave us electronic prepress and typesetting; the internet wiped out whole sectors of publishing and production. Both events forced many businesses to the wall, albeit for different reasons, but the net result has been positive. We have seen huge innovations in production software and hardware and in applications. More importantly we have a far more environmentally sustainable industry. Waste continues to be forced out of print media production systems and process control cuts energy usage and the associated emissions. Printing close to the point of use reduces transport emissions too.

But we suffer from oversupply. Manufacturers keep making more machines with more options and alternatives, in order to satisfy the pickiest of fussy customers. The resulting glut of technologies is constantly refined and gussied up, often in the name of sustainability. Examples of this abound. Textile press developer Kornit encourages customers to “only print what they need” to support fashion on demand. EFI and other companies claim massive reductions in the amounts of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) contained in their inks. The reductions are achieved through the use of less solvents, but no one talks about the environmental impact of cutting solvents in inks such as longer drying times or more waste because customers aren’t happy with the colour rendition of acqueous inks. This is a discussion that needs to happen because this kind of rhetoric from manufacturers is an easy win in sustainability conversations.

It isn’t exactly greenwashing, but it doesn’t really tell the whole story. For instance in evaluating the emissions impact of moving to aqueous inkjet inks, more than 90% of VOC emissions can be cut along with a high percentage, sometimes over 70%, of average carbon emissions. This is great information but all too often the data that supports the claim isn’t available or even referenced. The studies on which such claims are based are conducted in a somewhat informal manner and use data that is not necessarily complete. The data supporting claims for high emissions reductions are rarely shared for these reasons.

Coming up with a single methodology to work out how a given printing machine and its output actually reduce carbon emissions should be within the realms of possibility. Such a method would have to take into account the emissions associated with the printing machine’s manufacture, delivery, running costs, substrates and the consumables it uses. The method would also need substrate profiles that quantify a material’s carbon footprint, and this too requires a common methodology. We already have several ISO standards that support the needs of such a universal quantification standard, but an overarching method for quantifying the carbon footprint of print media production systems is still missing.

Source Information: This article was produced by the Verdigris Project, an industry initiative intended to raise awareness of print’s positive environmental impact. This weekly commentary helps printing companies keep up to date with environmental standards, and how environmentally friendly business management can help improve their bottom lines. Verdigris is supported by the following companies: Agfa GraphicsEFIFespaFujifilmHPKodakMiraclonRicohSpindrift, Splash PRUnity Publishing and Xeikon.

Image by Min An from Pexels

by FESPA Back to News

Interested in joining our community?

Enquire today about joining your local FESPA Association or FESPA Direct

Enquire Today

Recent news

Why are FESPA events the ideal place for visionaries to meet? With Harold Klaren from EFKA
Signage

Why are FESPA events the ideal place for visionaries to meet? With Harold Klaren from EFKA

We speak to Harold Klaren, International Sales Manager at EFKA about visionaries in print. Harold shares why he believes FESPA events are the ideal place for visionareis to meet.

23-04-2025
Why are FESPA events the ideal place for visionaries to meet? With Harold Klaren from EFKA
NSELED to showcase Innovation and transformation at European Sign Expo 2025
Digital Signage

NSELED to showcase Innovation and transformation at European Sign Expo 2025

NSELED Europe, part of leading LED display technology provider NSE, will welcome visitors to its stand at the European Sign Expo 2025. Ahead of the event, we speak with Daniele Rocca, principal chief executive officer at NSELED Europe, about what to expect from the company as the official ‘Digital Screen Partner’ of the event.

22-04-2025
Why the Future of Print Is Personal – and What That Means for Your Business
Personalisation

Why the Future of Print Is Personal – and What That Means for Your Business

Minna Philipson, CMO at Gelato shares how the future of print is personal, driven by demands for tailored, localised, and on-demand products. Businesses must adapt, embracing software to streamline operations and building customer-centric brands. Personalisation is key to connection, requiring emotional storytelling and flexible operations to thrive in the evolving market.

22-04-2025
The latest sustainable solutions in non-digital signage
Signage

The latest sustainable solutions in non-digital signage

While by no means a new concept in the market, sustainability is becoming an increasingly important part of daily life for sign-making businesses. Here, Rob Fletcher shares some of the non-digital materials to help companies become more planet friendly.

21-04-2025